Published: September 6, 2026 | 7 min read | Workflow Guide | Developer / Systematic Investor
A single sentence turns into a disciplined, risk-audited allocation — no spreadsheets, no separate tools. This walkthrough chains a plain-English screen through chaining, a strategy backtest, three independent AI analyst lenses, a risk audit, and an automated allocation.
Not investment advice. This video demonstrates platform functionality only, using real live data at the time of recording. Nothing shown constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security — please do your own research or consult a SEBI-registered investment adviser.
The Six Steps
1. Describe the idea in plain English
1
Type "profitable mid-caps with low debt and strong momentum" into AI Screen. Finmagine interprets it into concrete filters — mid-cap by market cap, debt-to-equity under a threshold, profitable across most of the last decade, and an RS Rating floor for momentum — and returns a real results table.
2. Chain a named preset
2
Click Refine These Results and layer Quality Compounders on top of the AI Screen's output — narrowing the field without starting over. The chain breadcrumb tracks both steps.
3. Check the strategy's own backtest
3
Because Quality Compounders is a named preset, it carries its own Backtest panel — a track record of the strategy itself against the Nifty over the last 90 days, not just today's picks.
4. Send a shortlist to the Investment Committee
4
Check 1–5 rows and click Committee. The shortlist runs through three independent AI lenses — Quality Compounder, India Growth, and Value & Safety — plus a Chairman that weighs where they disagree and writes a bull-and-bear case for each stock.
A real committee run — 4 of 5 stocks bullish on quality and growth, Value & Safety stays neutral across the board.
5. Run a Risk Audit
5
The Risk Audit checks portfolio risk score, annualized volatility, and sector concentration — surfacing flags like two sectors each carrying 40% of the shortlist.
6. Generate the allocation
6
The final step turns conviction and risk scores into a position-weighted allocation book — in this run, all five names cleared the bar and each received an equal 20% weight.
Risk Audit and automated allocation — all 5 names cleared the bar, so each gets an equal 20% weight.
What the Committee adds that the Screener can't: the Screener filters 6,000+ stocks by ratio thresholds — a quantitative pass. The Committee evaluates a shortlist of 1–5 stocks through three qualitative lenses and decides which is actually worth your attention, and in what order.
🇺🇸 Now Live for US Markets
The same plain-English-to-allocation pipeline now runs end to end on US stocks too — and the US Investment Committee actually carries more context than the India version, not less: a live news/sentiment feed and macro signals layered on top of the same three-lens review.
Not investment advice. This video demonstrates platform functionality only, using real live data at the time of recording. Nothing shown constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security — please do your own research before acting.
The US workflow at a glance: one plain-English query, chained and audited all the way to a risk-adjusted allocation.
1. Describe the idea in plain English (US)
1
Type "profitable mid-caps with low debt and strong momentum" into AI Screen on the US Screener. Finmagine interprets it into concrete filters — mid-cap size, low leverage, consistent profitability, and a momentum floor — and returns nine real companies.
AI Screen turns one plain-English sentence into four concrete filters — nine real US stocks matched.
2. Chain a named preset (US)
2
Click Refine These Results and layer Fortress Balance Sheet on top of the AI Screen's output — narrowing the field without starting over. The nine candidates narrow to four: Danaos, Teekay Tankers, DHT Holdings, and MarketAxess.
Fortress Balance Sheet chained on top of the AI Screen results — nine names down to four.
3. Check the strategy's own backtest (US)
3
Because Fortress Balance Sheet is a named preset, it carries its own Backtest panel — a real track record against the S&P 500 over the last 90 days: a 31.4% win rate and −2.37% alpha. Not every strategy is working right now, and that's exactly why you check it before trusting it.
The preset's own 90-day backtest — an honest, currently-underperforming number, not cherry-picked.
4. Send the shortlist to the Investment Committee (US)
4
Check the four rows and click Committee. The shortlist runs through three independent AI lenses — Quality Compounder, US Growth, and Value & Safety — plus a Chairman that weighs where they disagree and writes a bull-and-bear case for each stock.
Three independent lenses plus a Chairman — built to surface disagreement, not manufacture consensus.
5. US-only: live sentiment and macro context
5
For US stocks, the Committee can pull in two context layers that India's version doesn't have: your own Alpha Vantage news/sentiment feed, and macro context — Fed rate, VIX, and the yield curve. On Danaos, the bull case cites a real 30-day article sentiment score of 0.584 and constructive shipping sentiment on Hormuz capacity — a genuinely live data layer, not a static ratio.
Fed rate, VIX, yield curve, and a real 0.584 sentiment score for Danaos — US-only context layers.
6. Run a Risk Audit (US)
6
The Risk Audit checks portfolio risk score, annualized volatility, and sector concentration — surfacing a 4.8/10 risk score, 28.8% annualized volatility, and a 50% concentration flag in Energy for this shipping-heavy shortlist.
A real structural diagnostic — 50% Energy concentration flagged before a single dollar is allocated.
7. Generate the allocation (US)
7
The final step turns conviction and risk scores into a position-weighted allocation — in this run, mixed verdicts meant the model didn't force conviction: all four names received an equal 20% weight, with the remaining 20% held in cash rather than fully deployed.
20% each across the four names, plus 20% cash — the model pulling back rather than forcing conviction.
This is not cherry-picked consensus: the committee produced mixed, mostly neutral verdicts across all four stocks, flagged real concentration risk, and the allocation model responded by holding cash instead of manufacturing an all-in result. That honesty is the point of running a Risk Audit and Allocation step at all.